CLEPA and VDA publish code of conduct to address complexities of the automotive supply chain

A unified approach to responsible business practices!

in CLEPA, 30-09-2024


The CLEPA/VDA Business partner code of conduct is a joint initiative with the common standards towards business ethics, working conditions, human rights, health and safety, environmental leadership and supply chain due diligence for business partners at all tiers. It is our expectation that this document will lead to increased harmonisation in the supply chain and reduce administrative burden on suppliers from redundancy of requirements.

Read the full Business Partner Code of Conduct, as well as the practical guidelines, below.

Download the Business Partner Code of Conduct

Download practical guidelines

CLEPA | CO2 regulation review needs to secure tech-neutrality over the long term

The debate on the CO2 regulations for cars, vans and trucks is back on the agenda earlier than foreseen with prominent calls for a review already next year. It brings a critical issue to the forefront for Europe’s automotive sector: how to reach climate-neutrality while maintaining competitiveness. The relevance of this debate has been underscored by Mario Draghi’s report on EU competitiveness, which emphasises that the technology-neutrality principle “has not always been applied in the automotive industry”.

in CLEPA, by Benjamin Krieger, 26-09-2024


The automotive suppliers in Europe have long supported climate-neutrality. However, the current regulatory framework for reducing the climate impact of mobility seems to meet its limitations. The approach is too prescriptive in terms of technology, placing unnecessary restrictions on innovation, threatening both the industry’s economic competitiveness and its ability to meet environmental goals. We are already seeing the effects of economic strain on suppliers and manufacturers alike, with warnings of job cuts and sluggish electric vehicle sales.

CLEPA supports a substantial review of the regulations guided by the principle of technology-neutrality. Stricter targets set for next year create immediate pressure, while the 2035 ban on combustion engines, even in advanced hybrid configurations, is locked in by the 100% emissions reduction target. The pathway to achieving these targets must be reassessed to ensure technology-openness and to consider emissions over the life-cycle of the vehicle. The transition towards electrification needs to succeed but we will need all emission-reducing technologies to achieve our objectives.

Strengthening the course

Achieving climate targets does not require reversing course but demands a jointly supported position that ensures industrial strength, job protection, and market competitiveness. Alongside the review of the CO2 fleet regulation, we need to improve access to funding and de-risk investments in green and digital innovation, accelerate the rollout of charging and refuelling infrastructure, and ensure the development of a strong EV supply chain in Europe and access to raw materials. Equally crucial is improving the EU’s overall competitiveness by securing affordable energy supplies, reducing regulatory burdens, and ensuring access to key markets. We are looking forward to a more concrete exchange on the EU industrial action plan for the automotive sector, as mentioned in the Draghi report and mission letter for Commissioner-designate for transport, Apostolos Tzitzikostas.

The green transition is interlinked with digitalisation, and a clear ruleset on access to a vehicle’s data is paramount for driving fair competition in the aftermarket and data-based services.

The road to climate-neutral and smarter mobility will be challenging, but with the right policy measures in place, it is possible to meet environmental, industrial, and social needs. The next step is clear: policy makers must take decisive action and engage with the industry to ensure a future that supports both sustainability and competitiveness, healthy volumes and industrial strength.

Benjamin Krieger

CLEPA Secretary General

CLEPA calls for a technology-neutral review of CO2 regulations

In the context of the current debate on CO2 regulations for vehicles and their reviews, CLEPA comments as following:

We welcome the growing debate on CO2 regulations for new vehicles, as automotive suppliers are committed to climate neutrality in transport. We have long maintained that the pace of emission reductions required by the regulation is ambitious and, crucially, that the lack of technological neutrality within the regulations imposes restrictive limitations on the choice of viable technologies.

We support a substantial review of the regulations guided by the principle of technology neutrality, as recently advocated by Mario Draghi in his report. Stricter targets set for next year create immediate pressure, while the 2035 ban on combustion engines, even in advanced hybrid configurations, is locked in by the 100% emissions reduction target. The pathway to achieving these targets must be reassessed to ensure technology openness and emissions over the life-cycle of the vehicle, allow all emission-reducing technologies to complement electrification at the core without putting at risk the competitiveness of the industry.

This does not imply a reversal of direction, but rather underscores the need for strong political support to enable the successful market deployment of climate-neutral technologies. This includes de-risking investments, accelerating the rollout of charging and refueling infrastructure, and ensuring access to batteries and raw materials. Equally crucial is improving the EU’s overall competitiveness by securing affordable energy supplies, reducing regulatory burdens, and ensuring access to key markets.

Key for CLEPA is a regulatory approach that combines climate ambition with sufficient volumes and industrial strength, both in the short- and the long-term. We are eager to continue the dialogue and to find the best solutions for effective and efficient carbon emission reductions.

in CLEPA, 19-09-2024

CLEPA | Affordable mobility requires a robust regulatory framework for the automotive aftermarket

A study conducted jointly with Berylls by Alix Partners, in collaboration with CLEPA and FIGIEFA, and launched at Automechanika, has examined two potential scenarios that could significantly impact the cost of vehicle service and maintenance for consumers.

in CLEPA, 10-09-2024


The study underscores the potential for rising repair costs as authorised dealerships gain greater dominance. This shift is driven by growing restrictions on independent repairers’ access to essential data, information, and spare parts. To prevent a significant increase in repair costs and to maintain affordable mobility, proper regulation is crucial.

The study, which analysed the competitiveness of the European automotive aftermarket up to 2035, considered the impact of new vehicle technologies, cybersecurity requirements, and the shift towards software defined vehicles. From expert interviews with key stakeholders, and Berylls’s own analysis, the study identifies five key factors that will shape the future of the aftermarket:

  1. Limited availability of certain car parts to only vehicle manufacturers
  2. The need for specific coding or activation for replacement parts
  3. Challenges in accessing technical information for repairs
  4. Outdated interfaces for software updates in independent repair shops
  5. Limited access to in-vehicle data

The cost of vehicle repair is rising

Replacing defective parts is a standard service in the aftermarket. However, CLEPA and FIGIEFA have observed an increasing number of parts that can only be sourced from vehicle manufacturers. These parts often require specific coding or activation, which can add significant costs to repairs. With new EU cybersecurity regulations in place since July 2024, the number of such parts is expected to rise, further increasing repair costs for consumers.

Moreover, access to technical information, which is legally required is often limited or provided in formats that are difficult to use. This increases costs and delays in repairs, making current legislation ineffective. For software updates, independent repairers are still forced to use outdated vehicle interfaces, rather than state-of-the-art interfaces based on ethernet protocols.

CLEPA’s Senior Consultant for Market Affairs, Frank Schlehuber, states: “To ensure that consumers retain the freedom to choose their vehicle service providers, robust legislation that addresses cybersecurity, information access, and parts availability is essential. This will help ensure affordable mobility for EU citizens.”

Potential market scenarios and their impact

The study examined data from seven countries, with a total market volume of €150.2 billion for parts and labour at workshop level. Under the baseline scenario of 0.7% annual market growth, this market is expected to grow by €161.9 billion by 2035. However, if vehicle manufacturers increase their dominance, experts predict that repair and maintenance costs could soar to €197.9 billion – an additional €35 billion per year for consumers in these countries. This would make affordable mobility increasingly inaccessible.

In a more balanced scenario, where fair competition is maintained, consumer spending on repairs and maintenance could be slightly reduced to €159.8 billion. This reduction would be particularly beneficial for the adoption of battery electric vehicles, ensuring that the shift to more sustainable mobility remains affordable.

The role of legislation

The ongoing development of vehicle technologies is strengthening the proprietary position of vehicle manufacturers, making it crucial for legislators to act. The extension and revision of the Motor Vehicle Block Exemption Regulation (MVBER) beyond 2028 is paramount to ensure that all spare parts remain available to the independent repair market. Additionally, a smartly amended Type-Approval Regulation (TAR) that considers cybersecurity and ensures unrestricted access to repair and maintenance information can help reduce cost for consumers. Finally, regulations on the use of in-vehicle data and access to vehicle resources are needed to ensure consumers retain the freedom to choose where they obtain services.

 

Download the full study here